A mockup of a comment. Next to the user's profile picture, there's a rounded token that calls attention to its being a "Consensus Post".

Highlight Consensus Posts

Depolarizes conversations

Untested

Inference

Empower Connection

Highlight Consensus Posts

Share This Intervention
Back To Top

Overview

What It Is

This is an algorithm tweak that depends on the structure of the platform. One example of this is Pol.is, which has agree/disagree buttons on all posts, and tracks what groups tend to agree with each others statements and disagree with the other groups'.

Using those metrics they are able to find posts that distinct groups all agree on and can promote those posts within their algorithm to be more easily visible.

What Is Its Intended Impact

More attention is given to uniting statements rather than divisive ones, leading to less fraught disagreements and de-centering fraught disagreements that arise. This also promotes content from people who are willing to see people on the other side as people who they have things in common with, rather than those who see people  on the other side as implacable enemies.

When To Use It

How We Know It Works

Why It Might Work

Why It Matters

The most extreme and uncompromising users online are typically the authors of posts that get the most attention, but are a minority of users online. The fact that they are a minority is very hard to see when, because of their reach and the strong reactions they provoke, their content is far more visible than the content of people who are less polarized.

In many cases, these platforms are the only experience someone has of people who are on the opposite sides of political and cultural divides. This means that, while people recognize that the posts they see most often from people like them are from an extreme minority, they take the extreme minority of the opposite side to be the mainstream opinion and behavior of that side.

If we can center to voices of people who are on the opposite sides of these divides that are more representative of their reasonableness and openness to debate, then this can help bridge the cultural gap between each side.

Special Considerations

Examples

This entry is currently being researched & evaluated!

You could help us improve this entry by contributing facts, media, screenshots, and other evidence of its existence in the wild.
Email us

Our Confidence Rating

Inference

A grade of Inference is for proposed interventions that lack research of their own, but that could work by way of analogous studies, expert opinions, or first principles.

While this is, technically, the lowest evidentiary grade that we can afford an intervention while still including it in the library, this is not meant to discourage. On the contrary! This grade is very much an invitation to explore and experiment with it further.

In The Wild

This intervention has precedence, and exists, or has at one time or another, existed in the wild.

Citations

This section does not yet cite any sources.

There's more to learn about this intervention. Want to help?

Do you think this intervention could have more benefits, unacknowledged drawbacks, or other inaccuracies that we've neglected to mention here?

We always welcome more evidence and rigorous research to back up, debunk, or augment what we know.

If you want to be a part of that effort, we'd love to have your help!

Email us

Further Reading

Back to Prosocial Design Library
Donate
Contact
About
Library
Home